Animal Hoarding – A Serious Threat

We may know the “dog lady” on the street who hides the animals that “save her”. We turn a blind eye, and perhaps think – what harm can it do? We may think of her as a good person. But if it is one of the greatest animals, it can not only harm – it can kill, maim and cause indescribable torture for generations of vulnerable animals. Even the original is not immune, because the creature creature may also be a companion. Animal hoarding is much more prevalent than most people realize. Up to 2000 cases of animal hoarding are discovered in the United States each year – which adds to the suffering of thousands of animals – and may only be the tip of the iceberg.

According to HARC, the Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine has appropriated animal research, animal hoarding, formerly known as aggregation, is a poorly understood phenomenon that goes beyond mere possession or care over the usual number of pets, and affects every community in us . Have serious consequences for people, animals and communities. New cases are reported in the media every day, with dozens of other cases not reported and still not written. Animal hoarding is a community problem. They are cruel to animals, can destroy families, and are associated with mistreatment of the elderly, child abuse, self-neglect, and are costly for municipalities to solve. Without proper treatment after intervention, the retraction approaches 100%. Increased awareness is needed, leading to more comprehensive long-term interventions. Animal hoarding is not about harboring animals, rescue or sanctuary, and these legitimate efforts to help animals should not be confused. It is about meeting the human need to collect and control animals, and this need replaces the needs of the animals concerned. Animal hoarding has become a growing problem because it has become more recognized. The first animal search was discovered in 1997 by Dr. Gary J. Patronk, DVT, PhD and his team through HARC at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts. Dr. Patronek and his partners were the first to use the term animal hoarding and write the definition of the phrase, hence, the animal chunky is defined as follows:

A person who assembles a large number of animals fails to meet the minimum standards of nutrition, sanitation and veterinary care and fails to act on the degraded state of animals (including illness, famine, even death), the environment (overcrowding, Or the group’s negative impact on their health and well-being and on the health of other family members.

Hoarders can fool you. In public places they may appear to be well dressed, productive members of the community. They often care about their appearance, and may present a polished, even superior image, contrasting with the filth and degradation they live in. Perhaps the most prominent psychological advantage of these individuals is that pets (and other property) become central to the carrier’s basic identity. The fetus acquires a strong need for control, and the idea of ​​losing an animal can produce a very sad interaction. This may explain the difficulty this causes some observers of moccasins who misinterpret the grief reaction to a real concern for animal care when, in fact, guards are concerned with their own needs and not the condition of animals at all. One of the main points developed by HARC about animal hoarding disease is that while the librarians may view themselves as rescuers for animals, they are driven by the need for control. Hoarding is not about love or saving, but about power and control – the ability to control a helpless creature. Animal hoarding is a form of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) – the rationale is that no one can take care of the animal as much as he can, nor, most importantly, love her as much as he loves her.
It has also been suggested that animal hoarding is a form of negative cruelty. Defenders generally embrace great love for their animals, however, according to everyone’s standards, the conditions in which animals live are no less barbaric – houses are usually scattered and unhealthy with feces around the house, debris, rats, fleas and other parasites, and in many cases rot The bodies of the animals themselves are recognized by these people as their very love. Conditions are often in many of these homes, so that animal control officers, who are eventually called to deal with these cases, have been known to vomit at the sites they welcome when they finally have access. The smell of rotting debris, stools and ammonia from pets, doing all their work in four walls, is not only a dangerous and unhealthy display for these workers, but also for residents living with animals, and of course the animals themselves.

Studies indicate that in cases of stunting, there is often one person involved, or possibly a couple. Usually animal guards tend to be female, the only older person. They focus on one or two species and fail to recognize the extent of sanitation and animal suffering. They may also be disabled, retired or unemployed.

By definition, hoarding is a condition in which animals are deprived of the minimum standards of care. The consequences of this deprivation vary in each case, depending on how well they deteriorate until they are detected. In some cases, especially in the early stages, the signs of suffering are few – perhaps light weight loss, weak hair coat, and parasites. Despite any physical problems that occur or do not develop, the psychological suffering of intense confinement will go unnoticed. When conditions deteriorate and / or increases occur, disturbing levels of ammonia develop from accumulated feces and urine. Infectious diseases may spread, infections develop and are not treated, diseased animals are ignored and early stages of hunger may begin. As conditions deteriorate downwards, animals die because of lack of food, water, disease or untreated injury. It is not uncommon to find dead animals among neighborhoods, with some animals decomposing the bodies of others. In some cases, this may involve only a small number of animals, and in others, homes or farms become artisanal tombs, with bodies dispersed in the places where they are located.

Even when faced with stools – fecal feet or deeper animals, dead in human living spaces, a house unsuitable for human or animal habitation, the critic will deny that anything is wrong or will reduce the interpretation of events.

The role of excuses in hoarding the animal

One of the most outrageous parts of dealing with an animal store is the wide range of excuses that are presented for behavior and substandard conditions for animals and the environment. The finders are always in a state of total denial. Usually they may say that the house is just a little mess or the animals are fine, when you may have to choose your way through rotting bodies. Move excuses through attempts to maintain a positive self-image and self-esteem. Self-portraits are developed for both internal and external audiences. The external audience is persons who may be in a position to evaluate the person’s actions. Maintaining a positive image is important, and perhaps essential, to enable a person to continue with certain types of behaviors and avoid certain consequences. For animal manufacturers, HARC suggests that animals may be an important tool for building identity, and that animals may be critical in self-esteem.

The role of law and its relationship with animal farmers

Perhaps the biggest problem in trying to stop hoarding animals is the lack of strong animal laws. There is no federal law regulating pet care by landlords or animal shelters. However, every state in the United States has cruel animal laws that prohibit cruel treatment and / or require the owner to provide adequate shelter, adequate nutrition and clean water, a safe health environment, and essential veterinary care. Thus, at a very simple level, storage seems to be a clear violation of the most basic items. In practice, a violation of the law is more difficult than reading laws, for a variety of reasons, including the way in which laws are written. The language in the legislation is often ambiguous and outdated, leaving much room for interpretation. The finder can provide a loophole to determine what is necessary. An additional problem is that much of the cruelty that arises in these cases is the psychological suffering caused by chronic neglect, the intensive detention of small cages, the lack of opportunities for social interaction with other people or animals, or being confined to animals that may be aggressive Or threat. These are factors that can best be described as quality-of-life issues, which is almost uniformly absent from existing laws in any meaningful sense. Therefore, each court is left to its own mix of expert testimony and prevailing community standards. Even in the case of legislative standards concerning education, they often apply only to specific entities such as pet shops, shelters, kennels and batteries, making individuals such as dependents not subject to the law.
Despite these obstacles, investigation under the cruelty of animal laws is often the only way to start intervention in cases of compactness. Such an investigation must be carried out by, or under the direction of, a highly experienced human investigator. From start to finish, the collection of evidence in such cases must be controlled to obtain a warrant that would withstand and lead to either conviction or the possibility of reaching a favorable negotiating agreement or bargaining deal.
What happens when the hoarder is also an educator?
It may be easy to identify a “dog lady” on the street who has a lot of dogs, but what happens when a veteran of breeders? This area should be a major concern for breeders. Because hikers can pass to natural people who are well dressed, polite and gentle, they can easily hide their dark mystery. In general, hackers do not allow anyone to visit their homes or homes. The desktop may offer a very appealing exterior when appearing in public dog events. Misguided individuals may end up enabling racers to continue sliding into mental illness and cruelty to animals because they do not understand animal possession. Animal hoarding often appears in its entirety when one enters the hoarder’s home and sees the amazing dirty conditions in which they live. In fact, sometimes the homes of farm animals are so terrifying that buildings must be burned or scrapped. Top educators and rescue groups can ensure that their animals will not fall into the hands of the grower by conducting extensive interviews, as well as visiting the building before placing a dog in any home.
While the hoarding of animals is relatively unknown to the general public, it is a real mental illness that affects entire communities and causes the greatest harm to its animal victims. Defenders have archery-like abilities to present themselves as charming and active members of society while living in the darkest of terrible conditions and causing animals to control their lives in order to live a hellish life. The laws are obsolete and not equipped to deal with the problem, and there is currently no effective medical treatment for the state of animal hoarding. Detainees are more likely to disappear again even if they are convicted in the legal system because the system fails to monitor their activities. The burden of preventing suffocation is the responsibility of every one of us who loves our animals. We must talk to modernize laws and tighten penalties for inventors convicted at least to include surveillance; we must keep our eyes and ears open within the community in search of signs of local wrestlers. If a storage device is suspected, we must follow specific and well documented steps to close it.
Signs of Animal Hoarder:
• Farmers are often older women living alone
• Desktops usually do not have a support network from family or friends
• Detainees are usually present, retired or unemployed.
• It is known that up to 2000 hoarding occur in the United States each year.
• While crooks declare their love for animals, hoarding is not about love but about control.
• Writing is a form of severe disturbance. The hoards are mentally ill.
• Commentators are usually in a state of complete denial; they do not see the devastation it causes.
• Hoarding is not defined by numbers of animals, but in the way they are kept.
• Farmers are putting their personal and community health at risk.
• Farmers fail to provide a minimum standard of care or sanitation.
• Storage houses are usually in a stark state where buildings must be destroyed.
• Even if it is purchased locally, it is usually possible for battery holders to move and start the cycle again. There is almost 100% repetition rate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *